Universe | What if there are other ‘yous’? - Multiverse/Parallel Universe.

Hi Folks,

I watched this video about the multiverse on YouTube the other day and wanted to write about it to learn more about it myself. I often joke that I must be a fighter pilot 🛩️ like the Maverick from the movie ‘Top Gun’ in the parallel universe and I hope that is the case indeed.

I will also cover what Elon Musk thinks about the theory in this post, so stay tuned!

👁️‍🗨️ First things first, what are a ‘Multiverse’ and ‘Parallel Universe’?

Multiverse theory proposes the existence of multiple universes, including our own, each having its own physical laws and dimensions. Parallel Universe is a type of Multiverse where multiple universes exist in parallel with each other.

👁️‍🗨️ Why is the Multiverse Theory important?

The significance of the Multiverse Theory is that it has been a subject of debate and fascination for many years, and its implications have been far-reaching. It has the potential to explain some of the mysteries of the universe, such as the concept of infinity ♾️ and why certain physical constants exist.

Elon Musk talked about the theory a lot in the past to the point where he and his brother decided to ban the topic when they are in a hot tub.

So, I wanted to cover some key concepts about the Multiverse theory to get us started.

⚠️ Disclaimer: Please note that I am no expert in this field and I am a returning quantum physics theory enthusiast with not much background - I have not been staying up to date over the past decade or so and I am just writing this post as my passion pet project to blow up my mind. 😉#mindcandy 🍬

Let’s go! Vamos! Los!

I. Overview of Multiverse Theory

The concept of Multiverse is not new and has been explored in science fiction and philosophy for many years. In fact, it is not just a hypothetical concept, but it is based on real scientific observations and calculations. However, there are different types of explanations for the Multiverse such as the Many-Worlds Interpretation, Brane Theory, Inflation Theory, and Holographic Principle. So, let’s explore how they are different from one another.

II. Key Theories

• The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI): This theory proposes that every time a quantum measurement is made, the universe splits into multiple versions of itself, each with a different outcome.
• The Brane Theory: This theory proposes that our universe is just one of many branes or parallel universes that exist in a higher-dimensional space.
• The Inflation Theory: This theory proposes that the universe underwent a period of exponential expansion shortly after the Big Bang, resulting in the creation of multiple universes.
• Simulation Theory: This proposes that our reality is a computer-generated simulation created by a more advanced civilization. While the evidence for this theory is largely speculative, it has gained traction in recent years due to advancements in technology, which suggest that it may be possible to simulate a universe like ours.
• The Holographic Principle: Finally, this theory proposes that our universe is a hologram, and all the information about the universe is encoded on its boundaries.

Did I lose you already😂? Here are some more in-depth explanations! Buckle up!

👽 The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is a popular interpretation of quantum mechanics that suggests that when a quantum measurement is made, the universe splits into multiple versions of itself, each with a different outcome. This concept can be difficult to understand, but analogies and quotes from scientists can help to clarify the idea.

One analogy that is often used to explain the MWI is the idea of a coin toss. When you flip a coin, it can land either heads or tails, but until you look at the result, the outcome is unknown. According to the MWI, the universe splits into two different versions of itself: one where the coin landed heads and one where the coin landed tails. In each version of the universe, there is a version of you that observed the coin to land either heads or tails.

Physicist Max Tegmark has used the following analogy to explain the MWI: "Imagine you're at a fork in the road, and you have to decide which way to go. According to quantum mechanics, the universe splits into two different versions of itself, one where you go left and one where you go right."

It is like the movie ‘Sliding Doors (1998)’. The central character Helen (played by Gwyneth Paltrow)’s love life and career both hinge on whether or not she catches a train. There are two alternate storylines that unfold based on the binary outcome.

The concept of the MWI can be difficult to grasp because it suggests that there are an infinite number of universes, each with a different outcome. However, proponents of the MWI argue that it provides a more complete understanding of quantum mechanics and helps to resolve some of the paradoxes associated with the Copenhagen Interpretation.

Physicist Hugh Everett, who first proposed the MWI, said "The Many-Worlds Interpretation is not a theory, it is a way of looking at quantum mechanics. It is a way of thinking about the world that is different from the way we usually think about the world."

Physicist Sean Carroll has also commented on the MWI, saying: "The Many-Worlds Interpretation is the most straightforward interpretation of quantum mechanics. It takes the equations of quantum mechanics at face value and says, 'Look, this is what they say. They say that the world splits into multiple versions of itself. Let's take that seriously.'"

Some critics of the MWI argue that it is not a scientific theory because it cannot be tested, since we cannot observe the other versions of the universe. However, proponents of the MWI argue that it is a valid scientific hypothesis because it provides a consistent explanation of quantum mechanics and can be used to make predictions about the behavior of particles.

In summary, the Many-Worlds Interpretation proposes that every time a quantum measurement is made, the universe splits into multiple versions of itself, each with a different outcome. This concept can be difficult to understand, but analogies and quotes from scientists can help to clarify the idea. While some critics argue that the MWI is not a scientific theory, proponents argue that it provides a more complete understanding of quantum mechanics and can be used to make predictions about the behavior of particles.

👽 The Brane Theory is a hypothesis in theoretical physics that proposes that our universe is just one of many "branes" or parallel universes that exist in a higher-dimensional space.

The basic idea behind the Brane Theory is that our universe is a three-dimensional "membrane" that exists in a higher-dimensional space. This higher-dimensional space is sometimes referred to as the "bulk." In this theory, our universe is just one of many branes that exist in the bulk, each with its own unique set of physical laws.

One way to visualize this concept is to imagine a piece of paper as a two-dimensional brane. The paper exists in three dimensions (length, width, and height), but it is confined to a two-dimensional surface. Similarly, our universe exists in three dimensions (length, width, and height), but it is confined to a higher-dimensional space.

Physicist Lisa Randall has used the following analogy to explain the Brane Theory: "Imagine ants walking on a tightrope. To them, the tightrope is a two-dimensional surface. But to us, watching from a higher dimension, the tightrope is a three-dimensional object. In the same way, our universe may be a three-dimensional brane that exists in a higher-dimensional space."

The Brane Theory is often associated with string theory, which proposes that the fundamental building blocks of the universe are tiny, one-dimensional strings. In this theory, the different types of particles and forces in the universe are determined by the way the strings vibrate. According to the Brane Theory, our universe is a brane that is "stuck" to another brane, which creates the forces of gravity and electromagnetism that we observe.

In Physicist Brian Greene’s words, ****the Brane Theory and string theory: "Think of the strings in string theory as the notes on a guitar string. Just as different notes can be produced by vibrating a guitar string in different ways, different particles can be produced by vibrating a string in different ways. The Brane Theory takes this idea further by suggesting that our universe is a brane that is vibrating in a particular way."

While the Brane Theory is still a hypothesis and has not been proven, it is a popular idea in theoretical physics and has been the subject of much research and speculation.

In summary, the Brane Theory proposes that our universe is just one of many branes or parallel universes that exist in a higher-dimensional space. While the theory is still a hypothesis and has not been proven, it is a popular idea in theoretical physics and has been the subject of much research and speculation.

👽 The Inflation Theory is a scientific hypothesis that proposes that the universe underwent a period of exponential expansion shortly after the Big Bang, resulting in the creation of multiple universes. Here's an overview of the theory, along with some of its pros and cons.

According to the Inflation Theory, the universe underwent a period of extremely rapid expansion in the first moments after the Big Bang. This expansion is believed to have occurred due to a hypothetical field called the "inflaton field," which drove the universe to expand exponentially faster than the speed of light.

The rapid expansion of the universe during inflation smoothed out any irregularities in the cosmic microwave background radiation and created a nearly homogeneous and isotropic universe. In addition, the Inflation Theory proposes that the energy released during the inflationary period generated particles that could have formed the building blocks of matter.

Alan Guth, one of the pioneers of the Inflation Theory, described the theory as: “Imagine a balloon being inflated very rapidly. The surface of the balloon will become more and more uniform and flat, just as the universe became more homogeneous and isotropic during the inflationary period” or “Think of the universe as a loaf of raisin bread. As the bread rises, the raisins (representing galaxies) move farther apart from each other. In the same way, the exponential expansion of the universe during inflation caused galaxies to become more spread out.”

One of the most significant implications of the Inflation Theory is that it predicts the existence of multiple universes. According to the theory, the exponential expansion of the universe during inflation resulted in the creation of "pocket universes" or "bubbles" that have different physical properties than our own universe. These universes are believed to be part of a larger "multiverse," which includes all possible universes that could have arisen from different initial conditions.

Proponents of the Inflation Theory argue that it provides a compelling explanation for a number of observed features of the universe, such as its overall homogeneity and isotropy, as well as the presence of certain cosmic structures. In addition, the theory provides a framework for understanding the origin of the universe and the nature of its fundamental forces.

However, the Inflation Theory is not without its critics. One of the main challenges to the theory is the lack of direct evidence for the inflaton field. While the theory is supported by a range of indirect evidence, such as observations of cosmic microwave background radiation, some scientists argue that the theory is difficult to test empirically.

Another criticism of the Inflation Theory is that it requires a number of ad hoc assumptions, such as the existence of the inflation field and the specific initial conditions of the universe. Some scientists argue that these assumptions make the theory less elegant and less convincing than other cosmological models.

In summary, the Inflation Theory proposes that the universe underwent a period of exponential expansion shortly after the Big Bang, resulting in the creation of multiple universes. While the theory is supported by a range of indirect evidence and provides a compelling explanation for many features of the universe, it is also criticized for its lack of direct evidence and its reliance on ad hoc assumptions. Ultimately, the Inflation Theory remains a topic of ongoing research and debate in the field of cosmology.

👽 The Holographic Principle is a theory that proposes that our three-dimensional universe is actually a hologram that is projected from a two-dimensional surface that surrounds it. This theory was first proposed in the late 1990s by physicist Juan Maldacena, who showed that the holographic principle could be used to describe certain phenomena in string theory, which is a theoretical framework that attempts to unify all the fundamental forces of nature.

According to the Holographic Principle, all the information about the universe is encoded on its boundaries, rather than in the space inside it. This means that the universe is essentially a projection that is created by the information on its boundaries.

Imagine a 3D movie that is projected onto a 2D screen. Although the images on the screen are only two-dimensional, they appear three-dimensional to the viewer. In the same way, the holographic principle suggests that our universe, which appears to be three-dimensional, is actually a projection from a two-dimensional surface.

Think of a computer screen that displays a 3D video game. The characters and objects in the game appear to have three dimensions, but they are actually composed of 2D pixels. Similarly, the Holographic Principle suggests that our universe appears to be 3D, but is actually encoded on a 2D surface.

Proponents of the Holographic Principle argue that it could help to resolve some of the long-standing problems in physics, such as the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity. They also point to the success of the principle in describing certain phenomena in string theory as evidence that it could be a fundamental principle of the universe.

Critics of the Holographic Principle, on the other hand, argue that there is not yet enough empirical evidence to support the theory, and that it is still largely speculative. They also point out that the principle seems to imply that the universe is a computer simulation, which is a controversial idea that has not been proven.

In summary, the Holographic Principle is a theory that proposes that our universe is a hologram that is projected from a two-dimensional surface. According to this theory, all the information about the universe is encoded on its boundaries, rather than in the space inside it. Although the Holographic Principle has some compelling arguments in its favor, it is still largely speculative, and there is not yet enough empirical evidence to support it.

👽 Simulation Theory in the context of the four theories I mentioned above, suggests that these theories may be a way of describing how the simulation works.

The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) could be interpreted as a way of describing how the simulation generates multiple outcomes. Each time a quantum measurement is made, the simulation creates multiple versions of reality, with different outcomes for each.

The Brane Theory could be interpreted as a way of describing how the simulation creates multiple parallel universes. In this interpretation, our universe is just one of many parallel simulations running simultaneously.

The Inflation Theory could be interpreted as a way of describing how the simulation generates multiple universes. The exponential expansion shortly after the Big Bang could be seen as the simulation creating multiple universes.

The Holographic Principle could be interpreted as a way of describing how the simulation stores information about our universe. In this interpretation, our universe is a hologram, and all the information about it is stored on the boundaries of the simulation.

It's worth noting that simulation theory is still largely speculative, and there is no definitive evidence to support it. However, the theory has gained popularity in recent years due to the rapid advancement of technology, which has led some to believe that it may be possible to create a simulation like ours in the future.

III. "The Simulation is always on. Obv" - Elon Musk…and what this could mean for you?

Bringing back to reality, how this could affect you? The answer is: Elon Musk and Multiverse. Elon Musk has been a vocal proponent of the Simulation Theory, which suggests that we are living in a computer simulation created by an advanced civilization.

The implication is that the concept of Multiverse could impact the development of space travel and the creation of new technologies such as Neuralink for Elon Musk's companies, SpaceX and Tesla.

Here are some examples on what he said publicly:

• In an interview with Lex Fridman in May 2020, Musk discussed the likelihood of the Simulation Theory being true, saying, "There's a one in billions chance that this is base reality."
• During a Code Conference (2016), Musk reiterated his belief in the Simulation Theory, stating, "The strongest argument for us being in a simulation is the following: 40 years ago, we had Pong, two rectangles and a dot. That's where we were. Now 40 years later, we have photorealistic 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously, and it's getting better every year. And soon we'll have virtual reality, we'll have augmented reality. If you assume any rate of improvement at all, then the games will become indistinguishable from reality, just indistinguishable."

IV. Most Popular Scientists on Multiverse

Now that we covered some basic theories, I wanted to explore the most popular scientists who have contributed to the study of Multiverse.

Hugh Everett III: The creator of the Many-Worlds Interpretation, which is one of the most popular theories of Multiverse.

Sean Carole: A theoretical physicist known for his work on cosmology, gravitation, and quantum mechanics.

Linda Randall: A theoretical physicist who is known for her contributions to the development of the Randall-Sundrum model, which proposes a new way of understanding the extra dimensions of space.

Brian Greene: A theoretical physicist who has written extensively on Multiverse and has helped to popularize the concept.

Max Tegmark: A cosmologist who has proposed the Mathematical Universe Hypothesis, which suggests that reality is ultimately mathematical and that there are an infinite number of universes.

Alan Guth: A theoretical physicist and cosmologist known for proposing the theory of cosmic inflation, which explains the large-scale structure of the universe and solves several long-standing problems in cosmology.

Stephen Hawking: Contributed to the study of Multiverse and has proposed the idea of a "top-down" approach to Multiverse, where the laws of physics determine the structure of the Multiverse.

V. Future of Multiverse Theory

The Multiverse Theory is an evolving field, and scientists are still exploring different aspects of it. Studying the multiverse, the idea of multiple universes beyond our own, could lead to new discoveries and have important implications for our understanding of the universe. It could explain the fine-tuning of the universe, provide new avenues for exploring fundamental physics, and help in the search for extraterrestrial life.

If there are multiple universes, each with different physical laws and constants, then it is possible that there are other universes that are also finely tuned for life. By studying the properties of these universes, scientists may be able to learn more about the conditions necessary for life to exist, which could help in the search for extraterrestrial life.

Overall, the study of the multiverse is still in its early stages, and there is much we do not yet understand. However, by exploring the possibilities of multiple universes, scientists may be able to gain new insights into the nature of the universe and uncover new mysteries waiting to be solved.

Thanks for reading this long post! Hope you enjoyed the journey as much as I did. Share your thoughts and have a lovely day! :)

VI. Other suggested references:

📚 Books:

1. "The Hidden Reality" by Brian Greene - This book explores the various types of Multiverse and provides a comprehensive overview of the concept.
2. "Parallel Worlds" by Michio Kaku - In this book, physicist Michio Kaku explores the concept of Parallel Universes and what it could mean for our understanding of the universe.
3. "Many Worlds in One" by Alex Vilenkin - This book discusses the Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics and its implications for the Multiverse.

📕 Academic Research Papers:

1. "The Quantum Mechanics of Many Worlds" by Hugh Everett III - This is the original paper where Everett proposed the Many-Worlds Interpretation.
2. "The Mathematical Universe" by Max Tegmark - This paper discusses Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis and its implications for the Multiverse.
3. "The Holographic Principle" by Raphael Bousso - This paper explores the concept of the Holographic Multiverse and its relationship with the holographic principle in physics.

📺 YouTube Videos:

1. The Universe and Space stuff (playlist of 37 videos) by Kurzgesagt - In this video, the popular YouTube channel Kurzgesagt provides a simple and entertaining overview of Multiverse and Parallel Universes.
2. The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by PBS Space Time - In this video, the YouTube channel PBS Space Time provides a more in-depth discussion of the Many-Worlds Interpretation and its implications.

Additionally, Stephen Hawking and Thomas Hertog have worked together on the concept of a Multiverse and their research has contributed to the development of the theory of a "top-down" Multiverse. Here are some references related to their work:

1. "Populating the Landscape: A Top-Down Approach" by Thomas Hertog and Stephen Hawking - In this paper, Hertog and Hawking propose a top-down approach to the Multiverse, where the laws of physics determine the structure of the Multiverse. The paper was published in the Journal of High Energy Physics in 2006.
2. "The Theory of Everything" by Stephen Hawking - In his book "The Theory of Everything," Hawking discusses the concept of a Multiverse and how it could help to explain the nature of our universe. The book was published in 2002.
3. "The Grand Design" by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow - In this book, Hawking and Mlodinow discuss the concept of a Multiverse and how it could help to explain the origins of our universe. The book was published in 2010.
4. "Thomas Hertog on Quantum Cosmology" - In this video interview, Thomas Hertog discusses his work on quantum cosmology, including his collaboration with Stephen Hawking on the concept of a Multiverse.
5. "The Cosmic Inflation, and the Arrow of Time" by Thomas Hertog - In this paper, Hertog discusses the relationship between the Multiverse, inflation, and the arrow of time. The paper was published in the journal Foundations of Physics in 2019.

Today’s BGM: